The End Of The (Public) Debate

Those of you who have been regular readers of this blog and are my friends on Facebook have been following the Letters to the Editor that have been going forth since January between myself and Mr. Frank M. DePaola. I have enjoyed the debate, and was ready with a response to his April 2nd letter.

Unfortunately, when I sent my letter to the Republican-American, I got this response...

Mr. Baker:

Thanks for your submittal, but this exchange of letters has run its course and we won't be running any more from either side. I believe I have Mr. DePaola's address if you want me to send a copy of this letter directly to him.

Steve Macoy
Republican-American

While I understand that the Republican-American has every editorial right to refuse a letter if it feels that the letter is inappropriate, or unnecessary, I felt that Mr. DePaola and I should have been given equal time. (He had 3 letters published, I was only allowed 2.)

Furthermore, Mr. DePaola's letters had contained numerous errors that I felt needed to be addressed. Instead of ranting and whining about my letter being published, I will now share it with you and let you decide.

"In his letter Mr. DePaola again asks what the Republicans have done for Waterbury. It is nice to see that the Independents are getting good value for the $107.50 he was paid on Election Day. It’s also interesting to note that the school project that was “$1 Billion” on 1/13 became “$1 Billion-Plus” on 2/24 and “$1.5 Billion on 4/2.

If one looks at the websites of the Republicans in the Waterbury delegation, they can find a long list of accomplishments.

Rep. D’Amelio has served the 71st district since 1996, is an Assistant Minority Leader, and a Ranking Member on the Insurance Committee. Rep. Noujaim has served the 74th district since 2002, and has spent his time in Hartford supporting the East End of Waterbury, and its veterans.

Both men have worked to save Waterbury money through the proposed postponement of the In-School Suspension law, and were vocal supporters of the Heart Center in its fight for permanent status.

Sen. Caligiuri has served the 16th district since 2006. In just the past few months he has worked to strengthen equal pay laws, and improve the licensing and oversight of trash-hauling companies in the state. This is in addition to work on a “Three-Strikes” law for repeat violent offenders.

Furthermore, Alderman Ciochetti has spent a tremendous amount of time with the PAL program. His work with Main Street Waterbury to improve the parking downtown is extremely beneficial to the city. All four men have a record of distinction, and I am proud to call them fellow Republicans."

As always, I welcome your comments.

Stepping into the spotlight.

Today was a very interesting day for me in terms of my political future in the city of Waterbury, and my personal comfort level. As you are probably aware I have been a common sight at recent Board of Aldermen meetings here in the City of Waterbury, and when there is something important to discuss, I do not shy away from the podium. I have also spent a considerable amount of time writing "Letters to the Editor" for submission in the Republican-American, our local paper.

I have always been aware that these efforts draw attention to myself, and the causes that I am fighting for. I am well aware that anything I say at a meeting or in print, can and will be used against me in the court of public opinion. It's the risks of the job, and a risk that I have always been willing to accept. But even though I've known the risks, and potential rewards for some time, I can still be caught a little off guard.

Last Monday (3/23) I was at the Board of Aldermen meeting when I was approached by a reporter from the Republican-American. Apparently an e-mail I sent was "intercepted" by the Independent party. Anyone who reads this blog, or my letters, knows that the Independent Party is often the focus of my letters and speeches. I have my feelings about how they are governing the city, and thanks to the wonders of the First Amendment, I am free to express them.

In this particular case, however, the Independents tried to throw around words such as "conspiracy" to discredit my efforts. As I said before, I knew that these attacks come with the territory, and I answered the reporters questions truthfully and honestly. What I was doing wasn't a conspiracy, it was marketing and politics. Any political group that is serious about changing its community would, and should, do the same thing.

What caught me off guard about this interview, however, wasn't that it occurred, or the article that was published in the 3/25 edition of the Republican-American. It was the fact that I got home from work that day, and found a message from WATR, inviting me to be on Ed Flynn's "Talk of The Town" program. Realizing an opportunity for publicity, I accepted the invitation and went down to the studios this morning for my interview.

I've been interviewed before, I've done radio shows before, I've done Cable Access shows before, and I've spoken at meetings before. This time, though, I wasn't sure just how the listening audience would receive me. Mr. Flynn's show is so popular, that I knew there was a chance that I could be facing a hostile crowd. This left me both nervous and excited. Usually I know my audience, and I know what to expect. This time, I was flying blind.

Despite all the hype, my time on the radio today went quite well. Mr. Flynn and I had a pleasant chat about the goals of the Young GOP group I am the Vice-Chair of, my feelings about the city of Waterbury, and the future of the Republican Party. Despite the attention I've drawn to myself, there was only one call, and he was pleasant and interesting.

In the final analysis, it was a good day. I had fun on the air, I hope my message got out, and maybe I've made a difference in my hometown. After all isn't that what we're all aiming for in life?

"Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it so."

In his latest letter to the editor, (When have GOP leaders done good for Waterbury? – February 24) Frank M. DePaola exhibits the symptoms of a rather intense case of political amnesia.

In his letter Mr. DePaola claims to be responding to the information and opinions that I presented in my letter of 1/18, yet he spends most of his time repeating the same mistakes he made in his letter of 1/13. I guess Mr. DePaola subscribes to the notion that if you say something often enough, it becomes true.

As an example, Mr. DePaola claims that I spoke before the Board of Aldermen for a $60 million City Hall project. There are 2 major errors in his logic. First off, there never was a plan to renovate City Hall alone for $60 million. No matter how many times Mr. DePaola says otherwise, he is still mistaken. When I came before the Board of Aldermen from February to June of 2007, I was speaking in favor of a proper restoration of City Hall. I was just as satisfied with the $36 million project that was approved, as I would have been with the $39 million project that I originally supported. My main concern was not spending the city’s money, but restoring a building that is on the National Registry, and the centerpiece of our downtown.

Another example of Mr. DePaola’s selective memory resides in his insistence that the city tried to force a $1 billion school construction project on the taxpayers in one bonding package. Again, no matter how many times Mr. DePaola repeats himself, he is still mistaken. If he checked the minutes from the Board of Aldermen meeting on May 10, 2004 he will see the school-bonding package the he refers to.

Items 27 through 40 on this agenda mention 2 new elementary schools, a swing space for a middle school, an expansion of the Media Center at Crosby, and a new high school. While this proposal was negotiated into 3 new K-8 schools, and the Media Center expansion at Crosby, there is nothing on the agenda that would have cost the city anywhere near $1 billion. If Mr. DePaola can find an agenda for the Board of Aldermen or Board of Education that contradicts this, I would love for him to show me.

At the end of his letter, Mr. DePaola challenges Jason Van Stone and I to list some of the recent accomplishments of the Republican leadership. If one takes the time to look at the websites of the Republican members of the Waterbury delegation to the Connecticut General Assembly, they can find the answer that Mr. DePaola is looking for.

Rep. D’Amelio has served the 71st district since 1996, is an Assistant Minority Leader, and the Ranking Member on the Insurance Committee. Rep. Noujaim has served the 74th district since 2002, and has spent his time in Hartford supporting the East End of Waterbury, and its veteran population.

Rep. D’Amelio has spent time meeting with local leaders to find the best solutions to their budget problems. Both men have worked to save the city of Waterbury money through the proposed postponement of the In-School Suspension law. Both Representatives were also vocal supporters of the Heart Center of Greater Waterbury in its fight for permanent status.

In the upper chamber, Sen. Caligiuri has served the 16th Senate district of Waterbury since 2006. In just the past few months Sen. Caligiuri has worked to strengthen equal pay laws, and to improve the licensing and oversight of some of the trash-hauling companies in the state. This is in addition to his continuing work on a “Three-Strikes” law for repeat violent offenders. All three men have a record of distinction in Hartford, and I am proud to call them fellow Republicans.

Furthermore, Mr. Depaola’s desperate attempt to connect Mr. Van Stone and myself with the last Republican mayor is a tenuous leap of logic. Neither of us was involved in politics when Mayor Jarjura was elected in 2001. In fact, few of the candidates on Mr. D’Amleio’s ticket had even run for public office before 2007. Mr. DePaola, and the Independents he supports, wants everyone to believe that nothing has changed in the Republican Party. They have ignored the fact that the Republican leadership in Waterbury has undergone wholesale changes since 2002. They feel that if they keep saying something over and over again, it becomes true.

However, no matter how many times they try and say otherwise, the Waterbury Republican Party of 2009 is nothing like the Republican Party of 2002. The men and women who are involved now represent a new generation of leadership that is willing to bring the party into the 21st century with our heads held high. We will be the party of the future that brings ideas to the table and a willingness to work with the opposition to find solutions that are in the best interests of the city of Waterbury and its taxpayers.

In conclusion, despite Mr. DePaola’s best efforts in his exercise of First Amendment rights, he cannot change the truth. The truth is that the Independents have been spreading misinformation for 8 years now, and have nothing but campaign signs to show for it. Mr. DePaola my truly believe everything he wrote in his letter of 2/24, but when you consider the fact that Aldermen Denze and Booker paid Mr. DePaola a combined $107.50 of state taxpayer money for poll standing during the 2008 elections, it leaves one to wonder just how many of Mr. DePaola’s opinions have been paid for.

Happy 200th Birthday (Times 2)

Today is the 200th birthday of two men that had a tremendous impact on the world around us.


In the world of politics we celebrate the birth of Abraham Lincoln, our 16th President, the father of the modern Republican Party, and one of the most revered men in American History.


In the world of science we celebrate the birth of Charles Darwin, naturalist, and father of our modern evolutionary theory.

Both men are respected, honored, and debated in their own right. Both men have changed history, and we should do well to remember their words and their works. Whatever their intentions were, their impact is still being felt today. That is why we should all work to follow their example of service to country, and intellectual study in our lives.

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives… nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change." - Darwin

"But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract." - Abraham Lincoln

Spreading The Wealth Among Themselves

Today's Republican-American finally reported what many of us in political circles have known for several months now, the Independents main goal in the 2008 legislative elections was to line their own pockets. ("Independents Shared Wealth" - Penelope Overton)

I first reported on this issue back on 12/3, laying out how much money Larry DePillo and Mike Telesca received from Alderman Frank Burgio's campaign. (True Colors Of Independents - Green) But today's newspaper article shows that the self-serving goes much further then originally realized.

Mr. DePillo alone received a total $11,000 from the campaigns of Aldermen Burgio, Booker, and Denze. This is almost 10% of the $125,000 that the state provided for the three campaigns. Mr. Telesca also received a total of $6,000 from the three campaigns. That is a grand total of $17,000 out of $125,000 that went directly into the pockets of the men who founded the Independent party.

If this wasn't galling enough it was reported that the campaigns in question paid their poll standing crew for their efforts on election. Although none of this is illegal, the fact that most of these poll workers were family members of the candidates stinks worse then the sewage plant in the South End.

The men of the Independent Party try to tell us time and time again that they are looking out for the interests of the taxpayers of Waterbury, but all I see is the Independents looking out for the Independents.